Will Starship and Commercial Landers Make Artemis Better Than Apollo?
Will Starship and Commercial Landers Make Artemis Better Than Apollo?
NASA's making some big moves to finally get humans back to the moon for the first time in over 50 years. The Artemis program is shaping up with checks written and hardware built! So how does a 21st Century program to the moon compare to that of the 1960's?
In Today's video, we’re going to answer the question, why does NASA think Artemis will be a sustainable program when SLS is sooooo dang expensive AND it’ll take at least two launches to get humans and their lunar landers to the moon.
This CAN’T be more sustainable than Apollo, right? Well, we didn’t even begin to scratch the surface of the costs, so today we’re going to really dive into the total costs, including development, infrastructure and hardware by giving SLS and Orion a full cost audit.
But we’ll even show you how the Apollo program and Artemis mission profiles differ including the specific orbits and rendezvous and everything required to get humans to the surface of the moon and even talk about the upgraded safety considerations and hardware involved.
Once we look at all these details, we can answer the question, 50 years later, is the Artemis program actually an improvement over the Apollo program or is NASA going completely in the wrong direction when returning to the moon?
#ApolloVSArtemis #SLSVSSaturnV
00:00 — Intro
03:50 — The Hardware
15:55 — The Missions
29:15 — Safety & Upgrades
35:50 — Program Costs
46:20 — Rant
52:25 — The Good Parts of Artemis
55:35 — Conclusion
— Want to support what I do? Consider becoming a Patreon supporter for access to exclusive livestreams, our discord channel and subreddit! — patreon.com/everydayastronaut
This video wouldn't be possible with out the generous support of my Mission Directors on Patreon!!! — Frans de Wet, Gregory M. McKee, Chad Souter, Sam Fisher, Jason Kelnhofer, pexis petersons, Eric Beavers, Arthur Carty, Lawrence Mansour, Bob Lewis, DLB, Joshua Rule, Ryan M., David Glover, Scott G Raderstorf, Nicholas T. Gallman, Max Haot, John Malkin, TTTA, Jared smith, Simon Pilkington, Héctor Ramos, Tomdmay, Mac Malkawi, Ole Mathias Aarseth Heggem
Or become a YouTube member for some bonus perks as well! — www.youtube.com/channel/UC6uKrU_WqJ1R2HMTY3LIx5Q/join
The best place for all your space merch needs!
everydayastronaut.com/shop/
All music is original! Check out my album «Maximum Aerodynamic Pressure» anywhere you listen to music (Spotify, iTunes, Google Play, Amazon, etc) or click here for easy links — everydayastronaut.com/music
I'm the cohost of an awesome podcast where we talk all about current technologies and how they shape our future! ourludicrousfuture.com or here on YouTube www.youtube.com/ourludicrousfuture
NASA's making some big moves to finally get humans back to the moon for the first time in over 50 years. The Artemis program is shaping up with checks written and hardware built! So how does a 21st Century program to the moon compare to that of the 1960's?
In Today's video, we’re going to answer the question, why does NASA think Artemis will be a sustainable program when SLS is sooooo dang expensive AND it’ll take at least two launches to get humans and their lunar landers to the moon.
This CAN’T be more sustainable than Apollo, right? Well, we didn’t even begin to scratch the surface of the costs, so today we’re going to really dive into the total costs, including development, infrastructure and hardware by giving SLS and Orion a full cost audit.
But we’ll even show you how the Apollo program and Artemis mission profiles differ including the specific orbits and rendezvous and everything required to get humans to the surface of the moon and even talk about the upgraded safety considerations and hardware involved.
Once we look at all these details, we can answer the question, 50 years later, is the Artemis program actually an improvement over the Apollo program or is NASA going completely in the wrong direction when returning to the moon?
#ApolloVSArtemis #SLSVSSaturnV
00:00 — Intro
03:50 — The Hardware
15:55 — The Missions
29:15 — Safety & Upgrades
35:50 — Program Costs
46:20 — Rant
52:25 — The Good Parts of Artemis
55:35 — Conclusion
— Want to support what I do? Consider becoming a Patreon supporter for access to exclusive livestreams, our discord channel and subreddit! — patreon.com/everydayastronaut
This video wouldn't be possible with out the generous support of my Mission Directors on Patreon!!! — Frans de Wet, Gregory M. McKee, Chad Souter, Sam Fisher, Jason Kelnhofer, pexis petersons, Eric Beavers, Arthur Carty, Lawrence Mansour, Bob Lewis, DLB, Joshua Rule, Ryan M., David Glover, Scott G Raderstorf, Nicholas T. Gallman, Max Haot, John Malkin, TTTA, Jared smith, Simon Pilkington, Héctor Ramos, Tomdmay, Mac Malkawi, Ole Mathias Aarseth Heggem
Or become a YouTube member for some bonus perks as well! — www.youtube.com/channel/UC6uKrU_WqJ1R2HMTY3LIx5Q/join
The best place for all your space merch needs!
everydayastronaut.com/shop/
All music is original! Check out my album «Maximum Aerodynamic Pressure» anywhere you listen to music (Spotify, iTunes, Google Play, Amazon, etc) or click here for easy links — everydayastronaut.com/music
I'm the cohost of an awesome podcast where we talk all about current technologies and how they shape our future! ourludicrousfuture.com or here on YouTube www.youtube.com/ourludicrousfuture
0 комментариев